
|
Grootka |

|
Author's Introduction:
GROOTKA was my third novel to be
published. Discerning readers will notice that there was quite a long spell between my
first two novels and this one. Much had happened. In 1980, my wife Cinda died in an
airplane accident. We were living in Butte, Montana, where she was working for the Montana
Power Company. Our son, Devin, was not quite two years old. From my house I could see the
mountain where she crashed. I had some money from the insurance settlement and I decided
to move to the Bitterroot Valley, about seventy-five miles west, as the crow flies, but
some 120 miles of driving. I wanted to bring Devin up in a quieter environment, in a small
town, Hamilton, away from the sight of that mountain.
I had already started on Grootka
when the accident occurred. I was talking frequently to Jack Webb, who had bought the film
rights to my previous novel, The Blind Pig. It looked like things were happening.
Seymour Lawrence, then an editor with his own imprint at Delacorte, had told me that he
was interested in a multi-book contract if my option with Random House didnt work
out. But ... nothing worked out. Lawrence left Delacorte, Random House didnt pick up
the option for Grootka, Jack Webb died, and then Sam Lawrence died. I was
bewildered, to say the least. And, of course, I was raising a child by myself. To be
brutally honest, I was also drinking too much.
I think the rejection of Grootka
was particularly stunning, to me. This was a novel that had come to me in a peculiar way.
When Cinda and I were still living in Helena -- this was before Butte, when Devin was
still a tiny baby -- I was considering several ideas for a novel, when one night I had a
strange dream in which I saw this huge, hulking, menacing figure. I knew his name was
Grootka. There came to me a powerful sense of the story and I got up and rushed downstairs
to my study and groggily typed down as much as I could recall, then went back to bed,
confident that Id preserved at least a large part of the story. In the morning, I
found that Id typed only a few lines, including the name. But I still had a sense of
the story. I started writing it. Then a number of other events intervened, as Ive
indicated. When I really got down to the story, in Hamilton, now, after Cindas death
and moving and making brave plans for the future, it actually went very well. My editor at
Random House was very enthusiastic. I remember her saying, after reading the first fifty
pages or so: "This is great! Where have you been keeping this stuff?" It was,
thus, tremendously disappointing when she reluctantly rejected the novel. I was not to
know, for several years, that the reason for the rejection had to do with an editorial
shakeup at Random House. Evidently, there had been a change of editors and Barbe Hammer
was now out of the mystery division. And so was I, along with several other of
"her" writers. But I didnt know this. I thought it was because the book
"didnt work." And Barbe, loyal to the company, did not tell me
differently.
I struggled along for a couple
of years, writing new stuff, but not getting anywhere. I didnt even rewrite my rough
draft of Grootka. I eventually moved to a house out in the country. In, I think,
1986 or 1987, I got a phone call from Dennis McMillan, a young fan of noir fiction,
who was also a publisher of small, limited editions, mostly reprints of novels of the
thirties and forties. He happened to be a fan of The Diehard and The Blind Pig.
Hed bumped into a friend of mine, Richard Ford, at a book convention in Miami, and
learned that I was living in Montana and that I had an unpublished novel. I sent him Grootka,
although I was not greatly enthusiastic about an obscure publication of this book, which I
still thought was pretty good. Dennis really liked the novel, but he couldnt afford
to publish it. He did do a great paperback version of The Blind Pig, with a cover
and title page illustrations by my friend, the San Francisco underground cartoonist, S.
Clay Wilson. The best thing he did, however, was recommend the book to a small press in
Vermont, the Countryman Press, which had an imprint called Foul Play Press. There, two
rusticated editors from the publishing wars in New York, named Lou -- Lou Cannenstine and
Lou Wilder -- were enthusiastic about the book. Lou Wilder, in particular, loved it. They
published it in 1990. Alas, it was the last project for Lou Wilder. He died of a brain
tumor before publication, though not before we had galleys. A lovely man. His
encouragement was tremendous.
Subsequently, my novels have
been published by Atlantic Monthly Press, and I feel like Ive gotten back on track,
thanks to them, and, of course, to Dennis McMillan and Lou Wilder and Lou Cannenstine.
The character Grootka has been
good to me. Its hard for me to know how far (if at all) I departed from my initial,
dream image of this character and the story. Its possible that later ideas eclipsed
the initial image, but I dont think so. I feel that it was influenced, to a degree,
by characters in some of the works of Swiss novelist, Friedrich Durrenmatt. The key idea
was menace. The figure, or character, was to be a kind of force of nature personality. I
think Ive realized that in the character as he exists.
Another aspect was that as
the Mulheisen novels developed, I felt that the detective, Mulheisen, should not carry the
story alone. In fact, from the start, this had been something Id noticed when Joe
Service came on the scene. Grootka was another gesture in that direction. Joe, or Grootka,
are larger-than-life characters. Or, it may be, they are simply hyper-realistic
characters. Mulheisen is meant to be constrained by conventions of realism, but Grootka
(and Joe) has less need of "realistic" support. They can do things for the
author that Mulheisen cant: their actions dont need much background or
explanation. Thus, they both simply "know" things that Mulheisen has to figure
out. I dont fret about justifying their sometimes bizarre activities, not in the way
that I do for Mulheisen. This frees the action considerably. I dont mean to be
pretentious, but one could see them as a Caliban and an Ariel to Mulheisens
Prospero.
Grootka has now appeared in two
more novels, as the narrator of notebooks left to Mulheisen, in Man With An Axe,
and in a new story-in-progress, as a narrator of the story of Mo Free. The
character was drawn in part from stories I heard from my brother, Larry, about some old,
legendary hard-ass cops in Detroit.
Grootka has been an
important novel for me. I hope you like it.
Jon A. Jackson
Reviews
Mystery Guide Rating: 4 (Very good)
Jon Jackson is one of those really good writers that, strangely enough, don't seem to sell
much or win any awards. This type of police procedural is a bit out of fashion right now,
and Mr. Jackson has not been an extremely prolific writer of mysteries, and perhaps he's
had difficulties with a publisher or something -- but Grootka is a fine book that deserves
a wider audience.
Detective Sergeant "Fang" Mulheisen (if he has a first name, we never learn what
it is; even his mother calls him "Mul") is working two different homicides: the
first is a middle-aged Black man found in the trunk of an abandoned car (a plentiful
commodity in the poorer areas of Detroit); the second is a wealthy, cultured
Scandinavian-American widow, apparently the victim of a random rape-murder in her own
house. His supervisor wants him to ignore the former and concentrate on the latter; but
pulling in the opposite direction is an irresistible force in the person of The Great
Grootka, a legendary cop and sometime Mulheisen mentor. Grootka has some kooky idea that
the male corpse is an old buddy of his: a snitch, pimp, and bookie (but really a great
guy) named Erskine "Books" Meldrim; and that his murder is connected to the
30-year old unsolved murder of a beautiful teenage girl. The prime suspect in that case, a
classic sociopath named Galerd Franz, disappeared during the investigation; but Grootka is
sure that he's come back to the scene of the crime.
All the characters in the case are colorful and individual; the writing is introspective
and strong without being flashy; and there are bursts of wry wit. The plot is also a
standout, nicely blending police routine with intuitive insight; it twists and turns and
keeps you guessing till the very last word.
Reviewer: JP
©1999 Troutworks, Inc. |